Transparency data

Ministry of Defence Police use of force data: July to September 2020

Updated 12 September 2024

Main points summary

  • 43 instances of use of force by Ministry of Defence Police Officers recorded during the period from 1 July 2020 to 30 September 2020

  • The most common reason for use of force was to protect other officer – 26 instances

  • The most commonly recorded impact factor was alcohol - 19 instances

  • The most commonly perceived ethnicity of individuals subject to use of force was White - 34 out of 43 instances

  • The most common outcome was arrested - 32 out of 43 instances

Locations

  • In most cases, use of force by MDP Officers took place on streets/highways – 20 recorded instances.

Table 1: Reasons for use of force

Use of Force reason[footnote 1] Count Ìý
Ìý Ìý Ìý
Protect other Officer 26 Ìý
Effect Arrest 23 Ìý
Protect Self 18 Ìý
Prevent Escape 16 Ìý
Prevent Harm 10 Ìý
Protect Public 10 Ìý
Effect Search 10 Ìý
Prevent Offence 7 Ìý
Secure Evidence 4 Ìý
Protect Subject 3 Ìý
Method of Entry 0 Ìý
Remove Handcuffs 0 Ìý
Other 0 Ìý
Total 127 Ìý

Table 2: Impact factors

Impact factors[footnote 2] Count Ìý
Ìý Ìý Ìý
Alcohol 19 Ìý
Mental Health 12 Ìý
Drugs 12 Ìý
Prior Knowledge 11 Ìý
Possession of a Weapon 8 Ìý
Size/Gender/Build 8 Ìý
Acute Behavioural Disorder 0 Ìý
Crowd 0 Ìý
Other 0 Ìý
Total 70 Ìý

Table 3: Primary conduct/behaviour of subject

Primary conduct/behaviour ofsubject[footnote 3] Count Ìý
Ìý Ìý Ìý
Compliant 23 Ìý
Active Resistance 9 Ìý
Serious or Aggravated Resistance 4 Ìý
Verbal Resistance / Gestures 4 Ìý
Aggressive Resistance 3 Ìý
Passive Resistance 0 Ìý
No Data Available 0 Ìý
Total 43 Ìý

Definitions of the conduct/behaviour categories are provided at End Note [i]

Table 4: Tactics deployed[footnote 4]

Ìý Most common Second most common Third most common
First tactic:43 instances Compliant Handcuffing - 25 Non-compliant handcuffing – 5Unarmed skills - 5 CED – 4Firearms - 4
Second tactic:6 instances Non-Compliant Handcuffing – 2Ground Restraint – 2Shield - 2 Ìý Ìý

Table 5: Conducted Energy Devices and Firearms deployed

Presentation of Conducted Energy Device (Taser) Instances
CED drawn 2
CED aimed 0
CED arced 0
CED red dotted 1
Use of Conducted Energy Device (Taser) Ìý
CED stun 0
CED fired 1
Firearms Ìý
Firearm drawn 2
Firearm aimed 2
Firearm fired 0

Officer Injuries

  • Zero officers were assaulted or received minor injuries

  • Zero officers were spat at by the subject

  • Zero officers incurred severe injuries

Subject details[footnote 5]

Table 6: Gender

Perceived gender of the subject Count
Ìý Ìý
Male 33
Female 10
Transgender 0
Total 43

Table 7: Age

Perceived age of subject Count Ìý
Ìý Ìý Ìý
Under 11 years 0 Ìý
11-17 years 3 Ìý
18 - 34 years 23 Ìý
35 - 49 years 12 Ìý
50 - 64 years 0 Ìý
65 years or over 0 Ìý
Not recorded 5 Ìý
Total 43 Ìý

Table 8: Ethnicity

Perceived ethnicity of subject Count Ìý
Ìý Ìý Ìý
White 34 Ìý
Black (or Black British) 4 Ìý
Don’t Know 3 Ìý
Asian (or Asian British) 1 Ìý
Other 1 Ìý
Mixed 0 Ìý
Ìý Ìý Ìý
Total 43 Ìý

Disabilities

  • All subjects were perceived to have no physical disabilities.

  • In 8 out of 43 incidents, the subjects were perceived to have mental disabilities.

Injuries & medical assistance

  • Zero subjects received minor injuries in an instance where use of force was recorded.

  • Zero instances of medical assistance were required

  • Zero instances of medical assistance were provided

Table 9: Outcomes

Outcome Count Ìý
Ìý Ìý Ìý
Arrested 32 Ìý
Detained (Mental Health Act) 6 Ìý
Released/NFA 5 Ìý
Hospitalised 0 Ìý
Made Off/ Escaped 0 Ìý
Fatality 0 Ìý
Total 43 Ìý


Table 3: Primary conduct behaviour of subjects – Definitions

Compliant: No resistance to instructions

Verbal resistance: Verbal abuse or gestures made but does not offer any physical resistance e.g. verbally swearing, offensive finger gestures

Passive resistance: Resistance that is not physical in nature but is intended to stop an officer or the general public from leading their day-to-day activities for example, sitting in the road, refusing to move

Active resistance: A form of resistance or obstruction that is mildly physical in nature e.g. pushing, shoving

Aggressive resistance: A stage above active resistance where physical resistance is more pronounced but has no intention to injure an officer e.g. struggling against an officer

Serious/aggravated resistance: Use of violence against police with the intention to seriously injure or evade arrest for example, striking with a weapon, punching.

  1. Use of force can be used for several reasons in any given incident; there is a staged escalation process in the Police Service and therefore multiple reasons may be recorded for a single incident.Ìý↩

  2. Impact factors are not always relevant to instances of use of force and fewer impact factors than incidents may therefore be recorded. Likewise, it is possible to have multiple impact factors for one incident.Ìý↩

  3. Officers use the categories listed to best describe the primary conduct/behaviour of subjects. If the subject displays more than one conduct/behaviour, the officer will only record the most relevant or severe. Definitions of the conduct/behaviour categories are provided at End Note i.Ìý↩

  4. The breakdown of instances shown against each tactic is limited to ‘Most common’, ‘Second most common, and ‘Third most common’ so, in cases where more than three types of tactics have been used, the corresponding figures for each will not always equate to the total number of instances. In addition, the information provided in Table 4 and any corresponding bullet points does not include specific details on the deployment of Conducted Energy Devices (Tasers) or Firearms; where applicable, that information is provided at Table 5.Ìý↩

  5. Figures provided relate to the number of instances of use of force and do not always correspond to the specific number of individuals involved. For example, more than one instance of use of force could be attributed to the same person.Ìý↩